Skip to content
Carbon Get the full report

Inside the 2026 B2B Buyer’s Report

What B2B buyers told us.

Explore the findings behind Carbon’s study of 189 B2B decision-makers: how they compare providers, reconsider partners and decide what deserves a closer look.

Explore the findingsHow the study was conducted

Research by Carbon
Findings companion published September 16, 2026.

Satisfaction & switching

“Happy” doesn’t mean settled.

94%

are satisfied with their current B2B partners overall.

177 of 188 respondents · Q36

59%

are likely to reconsider at least one partner in the next 12 months.

110 of 186 respondents · Q28

54%

have reconsidered a partner despite being generally satisfied.

99 of 184 respondents · Q33

These are three separate questions with different response bases. They do not add to 100% or show which individual customers will leave.

See the questions and how these figures were calculated

Q36: “How satisfied are you with the B2B partners your organization currently uses overall?” The 94% combines 104 somewhat satisfied and 73 very satisfied responses, divided by 188.

Q28: “How likely is your organization to review or reconsider at least one current B2B partner in the next 12 months?” The 59% combines 74 somewhat likely and 36 extremely likely responses, divided by 186.

Q33: “Have you re-evaluated or considered replacing a B2B partner in the past, despite being generally satisfied with their performance?” The 54% represents 99 “Yes” responses out of 184.

AI & the buying decision

You’re already in the comparison.

AI helps buyers do more than find a name. In this study, 57% selected comparing providers side by side as a way they use AI during discovery or evaluation.

Carbon’s take

Give buyers something useful to compare. Explain who you help, what you actually do and the evidence behind it. A clear case study can answer questions a list of capabilities leaves open.

How respondents use AI

Comparing providers57%
Summarizing vendor information48%
Generating background information45%
Generating shortlist criteria38%

Selected responses · Q15 · n = 188
Multiple selections allowed. Bars use a 0–100% scale.

View all responses and the survey question

“Which of the following ways, if any, do you use AI during the partner discovery or evaluation process? Select all that apply.”

Q15 · Base: 188 respondents
ResponseCountShare
Comparing providers side by side10757%
Summarizing vendor information9148%
Generating background information on the partner8445%
Generating shortlist criteria7238%
Identifying risks or gaps6836%
Drafting questions for vendors6635%
Reviewing case studies or references5228%
I do not use AI in this process2614%

Percentages use all respondents to this question, including those who selected that they do not use AI. They are not percentages of AI users alone.

Reasons to reconsider

Give them a reason to stay.

Better value led the reported reasons a new partner could become attractive. Expertise and proof of results also featured prominently.

Carbon’s take

Make your contribution easy to explain inside the customer’s business. Show the work, connect it to their priorities and ask what they need next. Value needs a clearer story than a price alone.

What could prompt a switch?

Better value for the cost59%
Stronger expertise or specialization40%
Better proof of results / ROI39%

Top three selections · Q21 · n = 188
Stated considerations, not observed switching outcomes.

View all responses and the survey question

“What would make your organization most likely to switch from a current B2B partner to a new one? Select all that apply.”

Q21 · Base: 188 respondents · Multiple selections allowed
ResponseCountShare
Better value for the cost11059%
Stronger expertise or specialization7540%
Better proof of results / ROI7339%
Better technology or innovation7138%
Better customer service / support6635%
Better reputation or trust6635%
Stronger strategic thinking5730%
Better integration with our systems / processes5730%
Easier implementation5529%
Other21%

Multiple selections were allowed, so percentages do not add to 100%. These answers do not establish that any particular action will prevent a customer from leaving.

About the research

The people behind the percentages.

Carbon’s national quantitative study explores how people discover, evaluate and reconsider B2B partners.

The findings describe reported attitudes and experiences. They do not establish cause and effect or predict the behavior of an individual company.

Study
Carbon’s 2026 B2B Buyer’s Report
Sample
189 quality-filtered responses in the study’s final analysis.
Participants
People involved in selecting, evaluating or managing business partners.
Scope
B2B partners, vendors and service providers across industries. The study is not limited to marketing agencies.
Calculations
Question-specific response bases are shown with each finding. Percentages are rounded to whole numbers.
Reading the data
Some questions allow multiple answers. Separate questions and differently sized bases should not be combined into a single result.

Read the full report and methodology

A finding worth sharing?

Credit Carbon’s 2026 B2B Buyer’s Report, include the question and response base, and link to the original research.

Download these findings as CSV

Put the findings to work

What are your buyers thinking?

Bring us the question. We’ll help you get closer to the answer.

Get the full B2B Buyer’s Report

Explore buyer research